This makes your units more like a series of linked first person shooters stitched together in the map operating independently of each other to create an unplayable Frankenstein monster of a strategy game.
The first game seemed to nail the allowable zoom so that it could be played like a strategy but the second is only focused on zooming in as far as possible so you can relieve yourself to the level of detail the designers went to looking at the sky and trees and the snow falling. The first game seemed to nail the allowable zoom so that it could be played like a strategy but the second is only focused on zooming in as far as possible so you can relieve yourself to the level of detail the designers went to looking at the sky and trees and the snow After playing the first Company of Heroes and really enjoying it I purchased the second version expecting big things. … ExpandĪfter playing the first Company of Heroes and really enjoying it I purchased the second version expecting big things. Don't buy this unless its on 80% off or you know history well. This game is a complete disappointment for me and many other Company of Heroes fans. The DLCs that are game changing are really unbalanced. I was still willing to give the multiplayer a chance, but that failed me too due to the lack of balance and constant buffing some type of German soldiers or vehicles. I was still willing to give the multiplayer a chance, but that failed me too due to the lack of balance and constant buffing some type of German At first the game was brilliant (i'm talking about the beta), but then after playing the game where the Soviets were portrayed as the evil ones in the war and the poor Germans against them really made me hate the game. At first the game was brilliant (i'm talking about the beta), but then after playing the game where the Soviets were portrayed as the evil ones in the war and the poor Germans against them really made me hate the game.
0 kommentar(er)
